Well, first off, people expect to have to worry more about what things may look like when flying than in normal situations so I think it is kind of a silly justification for the stance that Ahmed's treatment was reasonable.
I thought you said no one knew what happened behind closed doors and there would be a reason--or am I mixing up posters?So, now you are implying that I am trying to justify that what happened was reasonable? Where the heck are you getting that? I have prefaced all my comments with the statement that I don't know what happened.
I honestly would not try to carry this device on a plane. I think it would give even trained personnel pause, so why go there.
What I cannot understand is why, lacking any evidences that it was anything other than a clock. and with the student repeating that it was a clock and never indicating otherwise, the student was handcuffed and taken away from school.
It can't be a bomb. There isn't any explosive component to it. Just wires and circuits.
“If the family is willing to give us written permission, we would be happy to share with the public the other side of the story so they can understand the actions we took,” Irving Independent School District spokeswoman Lesley Weaver said.The parents will not allow Ahmed's interview to be published. They are fully within their rights to do this. It might help to clear up confusion as to the overreaction though. Ahmed did show the clock to his engineering teacher who told him NOT to show it to anyone else. The clock went off in his English Class. His teacher was not happy. He brought it to the teacher at the end of class. The teacher kept it and Ahmed was pulled out of class in 6th period.
Hopefully, because the reaction has been over the top all he way around, people will still "See something, say something". The next briefcase clock brought into a school may not be a clock but a bomb that explodes. Then, of course, teachers/admins will be blamed for not taking action.
Heck, the kid's name is Ahmed. Who knows, maybe mom had him swallow some explosive so he could use the clock as a detonator.
Got links?
I thought this thread could use a little light heartedness
So *IF* a teacher thought this was a bomb...Hopefully, because the reaction has been over the top all he way around, people will still "See something, say something". The next briefcase clock brought into a school may not be a clock but a bomb that explodes. Then, of course, teachers/admins will be blamed for not taking action.
So *IF* a teacher thought this was a bomb...
1) Why was the classroom or school not evactuated?
2) Why was the bomb squad not called?
I read a quote from the LEO that said he should have been "more forthcoming". Evidently in TX, when you're asked a question and say, "It's a clock and nothing but a clock" that is not considered "forthcoming" enough and you're accused of building a fake bomb.
“If the family is willing to give us written permission, we would be happy to share with the public the other side of the story so they can understand the actions we took,” Irving Independent School District spokeswoman Lesley Weaver said.The parents will not allow Ahmed's interview to be published. They are fully within their rights to do this. It might help to clear up confusion as to the overreaction though. Ahmed did show the clock to his engineering teacher who told him NOT to show it to anyone else. The clock went off in his English Class. His teacher was not happy. He brought it to the teacher at the end of class. The teacher kept it and Ahmed was pulled out of class in 6th period.
Hopefully, because the reaction has been over the top all he way around, people will still "See something, say something". The next briefcase clock brought into a school may not be a clock but a bomb that explodes. Then, of course, teachers/admins will be blamed for not taking action.
So *IF* a teacher thought this was a bomb...
1) Why was the classroom or school not evactuated?
2) Why was the bomb squad not called?