Ah. Well at least I understand your point. You don’t like Aulani because:
1. It‘s simulated thatching is not to your taste, but apparently you like AKL’s simulated thatching better.
2. Aulani’s large U shape is not aesthetically appealing to you. but apparently you like the large U shape of Wilderness Lodge better.
3. Or perhaps you enjoy Kidani Village’s miles of scenic, well themed underground parking? Or perhaps you miss the exercise opportunities offered by the mile long hallways at Kidani Village?
Not defending Aulani to you, just enjoying the debate. All of those WDW resorts you reference, which, don’t get me wrong, are indeed great, have their negative quirks as well.
Ah. Well at least I understand your point. You don’t like Aulani because:
1. It‘s simulated thatching is not to your taste, but apparently you like AKL’s simulated thatching better.
2. Aulani’s large U shape is not aesthetically appealing to you. but apparently you like the large U shape of Wilderness Lodge better.
3. Or perhaps you enjoy Kidani Village’s miles of scenic, well themed underground parking? Or perhaps you miss the exercise opportunities offered by the mile long hallways at Kidani Village?
Not defending Aulani to you, just enjoying the debate. All of those WDW resorts you reference, which, don’t get me wrong, are indeed great, have their negative quirks as well.
Maybe enjoying the debate to the point of prolonging it by willfully misunderstanding me? My observation was in regards to the internal architecture. Regardless of the hotel's size, without spaces used in imaginative ways, it's just a hotel covered in "simulated logs" and "simulated thatching" (your words). At least apparently we can agree that Kidani looks like one big parking garage, never cared for that one.