To lament a particular change is not to insist that Disney must always stay the same in all respects. Boards like this give us a chance to express our opinions about the changes, pro or con. I expect that I am like most in that I miss some things that are gone, and not others. I certainly understand that change is inevitable, and that progress is good. I love most of the new rides and attractions, don't miss many of the old ones, and greatly look forward to the additions on the horizon.
In my opinion, Maelstrom was kind of a hot mess and Frozen Ever After is probably a better ride. It's certainly a more popular one. But changing the Norway pavilion into a celebration of a fictional country was, to me, a shame. Norway is a real place -- fascinating and beautiful. Maelstrom tried, however imperfectly, to capture its past, its present, and its mythology. I would have much rather seen a makeover than a replacement. I would be all for a Frozen Land in DHS; I just don't like the repurposing of the World Showcase.
I'm fully aware that that's a quirky view. The crowds have spoken, and Disney has heard them. Which is why, I suspect, we will see more changes like that one going forward. But I know I'm not alone in lamenting this particular development.
Disney dismisses nostalgia at its own risk. Change is inevitable and good. But not all changes are necessarily good ones.