I'm very happy about that. I hope it stays that way. Disney has a tendency of replicating things that do well...Well, at least it's California's tower and not Florida's
The only way things change are if people stop going and if new management gets in.Yikes...negative comments on Facebook are already 200:1.
no offense to anyone but I can't help but feel like we take any new ride confirmations with skepticism and doubt. I definitely don't see it here but just seeing the Facebook ratio makes me think that. One day I would love for open arms to attraction confirmations, but whatever. I'm weird and optimistic. Personally I kind of don't care about this announcement (it's in California which I'm probably not going to anytime soon and it's pretty much replacing the red-headed step child of the towers worldwide, after all it was an afterthought trying to get people to go to California Adventure in the first place). I am intrigued though about the final product and what's to come from there. I am excited but when I meant I don't care, I'm just moving on with my life compared to skipping for joy like when I see an MGM update.Yikes...negative comments on Facebook are already 200:1.
I think it's hilariously ambitious of them to announce it CLOSING in early 2017 to reopen by SUMMER 2017. I'll believe it happens that quick when I see it. Couldn't retheme Maelstrom (which is WAY less complicated) in a short period of time.
Well this is Disneyland not WDW. This is also not as extensive as maelstrom was. The ride system and vehicles are staying exactly the same. It's just a simple theming change. I'd argue maelstrom was more complicated.I think it's hilariously ambitious of them to announce it CLOSING in early 2017 to reopen by SUMMER 2017. I'll believe it happens that quick when I see it. Couldn't retheme Maelstrom (which is WAY less complicated) in a short period of time.
From what I've heard that's been the plan all along.Right? I was about to post the same thing. Seems ... optimistic.
no offense to anyone but I can't help but feel like we take any new ride confirmations with skepticism and doubt. I definitely don't see it here but just seeing the Facebook ratio makes me think that. One day I would love for open arms to attraction confirmations, but whatever. I'm weird and optimistic. Personally I kind of don't care about this announcement (it's in California which I'm probably not going to anytime soon and it's pretty much replacing the red-headed step child of the towers worldwide, after all it was an afterthought trying to get people to go to California Adventure in the first place). I am intrigued though about the final product and what's to come from there. I am excited but when I meant I don't care, I'm just moving on with my life compared to skipping for joy like when I see an MGM update.
Also that's a short turnaround time for work! When was the last time we saw that, gran fiesta tour?
Well this is Disneyland not WDW. This is also not as extensive as maelstrom was. The ride system and vehicles are staying exactly the same. It's just a simple theming change. I'd argue maelstrom was more complicated.
The only way things change are if people stop going and if new management gets in.
I was too. Maelstrom was ok but neat considering it was like a b-ticket compared to every other dark ride on property. For protesting, it depends where. If it's in universe of energy I'll be ok with that. Tower in Florida? Absolutely noI was actually OK with the Frozen overlay in EPCOT. I will physically picket if this is announced for WDW.
I'm guessing not many comments are going to be getting through...How long do comments sit in moderation on the parks blog site? I'm refreshing and still seeing zero comments.