LiveYourLife
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2012
Irony is alive and well right now on the DIS.
Its the mom's "every human being deserves our attention and respect" attitude that I really don't agree with. I don't believe everyone deserves our attention, I believe we as individuals deserve to choose who we want to give our attention too. I guess in some people's eyes not giving attention to others you don't want too is unkind, or borderline bullying. That is not how I see it at all.
The mom says her dd was not overtly unkind, there was no name calling, she just didn't have any interest in this other kid, and the mom forced the issue. She called the kid's mom, and spoke to teachers about it. That goes a little to far into controling and helicoptering for my taste. By the time my kids were in 4th grade they knew what kind of kid they wanted to hang out with, mom wasn't forcing playdates anymore, they were picking their own friends.
I would let it happen naturally, if this kid did have something to offer as far as friendship it will happen, if she doesn't then it isn't meant to be.
Sure this story had a happy outcome, but the truth is we have no idea what would have happened if the mom decided not to involve herself at all. The kids were in 4th grade, assuming neither was moving any time soon they would have years to develop of a friendship, or not, which is okay too.
I don't agree with her approach at all, but I do agree that we should all be kind. It just depends on what you call "kind" and "unkind" and I don't see kids not having any interest in another as unkind. How they act is what would determine their level of kindness, are they nasty, calling names, laughing at the kid. Or are they just not paying attention them, or telling them they really don't want to hang out or play.
Parents need to teach their kids how to handle rejection as much as they need to teach their kids not to be bullies. Both very valuable life lessons.
For some people, I guess, being kind means not doing something. Not being mean, nasty, laughing at someone, etc.
For others, it means actually doing something. Being friendly, generous, considerate of someone, etc. It's actually putting yourself out there and making it happen.
I think, in its simplest forms, this may be the disconnect we're seeing here.
noun: kindness
The quality of being friendly, generous, and considerate; a kind act
View attachment 163840
Irony is alive and well right now on the DIS.
Just hazarding a guess, but I'm thinking the aforementioned cryptic quote was referring to another poster who is feeling "left out" here on the boards. But it's just a guess.I hope you dont mean any of the posters in this thread...
Just hazarding a guess, but I'm thinking the aforementioned cryptic quote was referring to another poster who is feeling "left out" here on the boards. But it's just a guess.
See Page 1 of the CB and pick a thread.Well call me clueless....
I have a problem with that. The kids were told "pick 3 friends to room with". They did. Then you want the teacher to go back and say "no, it would be better to separate you four so 'x' doesn't feel left out"? Sorry, at some point kids need to learn not everyone is their friend, not everyone is "nice". Now, should we (adults) encourage kids to be FRIENDLY? Yes. But you can't force them to be friends. IMO, your suggestion is close to coddling. Maybe the "5th" will find some other people to hang around with that he likes better.As for the group of 5 mentioned above, I believe that a kinder solution would have been for the kids to split up into 2 and 3 and fill in the other spaces in their rooms with other boys. That way one boy wouldn't have been left out.
Who gets to determine what a "legit" reason is? I'm guessing the kids think they have a legit reason. Maybe they know the other kid snores. Maybe the other kid never settles down when it's time to sleep.But being in a clique and freezing a kid out for no legit reason does. Shunning for no legit reason is a more subtle type of bullying. But it is bullying. And after mom made the kid do the right thing her kid found out the other kid wasn't so bad.
I don't get the quote either.Just hazarding a guess, but I'm thinking the aforementioned cryptic quote was referring to another poster who is feeling "left out" here on the boards. But it's just a guess.
Just hazarding a guess, but I'm thinking the aforementioned cryptic quote was referring to another poster who is feeling "left out" here on the boards. But it's just a guess.
I hope you dont mean any of the posters in this thread...I have felt like it has been a civil discussion. I dont care if we dont see eye to eye and I appreciate the other viewpoints even if I dont agree.
You are very, very warm!
I do.
I agree with you, it has been a healthy and civil discussion with differing viewpoints. However, what is ironic to me is how someone can be so strong in their convictions on one thread but then on another thread they go against those same convictions.
If there were no other boys to room w/ the 5th boy, as a parent or teacher, I would have stepped in & said 2 boys in one room & 3 boys in the other.
And no one says you have to invite everyone to parties, but it's one thing to invite your 5 closest friends & not invite the 10 other girls in the class and another thing to invite 9 girls & just leave one out.