Searc
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2018
That's the minimum price. There are rooms/suites that are even more obscenely priced.2 night/3 day stay starting at $3,300 per person, if I understand it correctly.
That's the minimum price. There are rooms/suites that are even more obscenely priced.2 night/3 day stay starting at $3,300 per person, if I understand it correctly.
$3300pp for 2 nights 3 days
Disney is truly becoming a playground for the wealthy vs average families.
Where will it end?
I don't think it will be first time visitors at all. I think the market is Star Wars fanatics, movers & shakers/trendsetteres, and people with sufficient disposable income.I know a person who has been saving for years since this was announced b/c she has a son who loves Star Wars that much. Star Wars isn’t my thing, but I just assumed there would many other super fans doing the same. Plus, if their price point doesn’t work, then can just offer discounts & ppl will feel like they’re getting something special.
The article says a family of five would pay $7,200. $3,300 is a different version of the earned single supplement.So for a family of only 3 people you're looking at 10 Grand for a 2 night stay - not counting food and park tickets? Wow, just wow.
Which metrics?By all metrics, we are headed for a recession
The one that some news outlets want people to think is coming and hope comes.Which metrics?
No me either. I was responding to the pp who said ppl would only pay at first but that there wouldn’t be repeat visitors. I didn’t mean first time visitors to wdw, but first time visitors to the new hotel. Much like the parks, I don’t think they’ll run out of the first timers for that.I don't think it will be first time visitors at all. I think the market is Star Wars fanatics, movers & shakers/trendsetteres, and people with sufficient disposable income.
The article says a family of five would pay $7,200. $3,300 is a different version of the earned single supplement.
But do you get to leave and go to the parks or is it just expensive prolonged LARPing?
Which metrics?
- The yield curve is a poor indicator of a recession as a standalone indicator. Also, in previous recessions, the yield curve inverted greatly. The yield curve inverted briefly in this case. The curve would need to be inverted for much longer and deeply to indicate a recession.The bond yield curve has inverted, which has presaged the last seven recessions. Consumer confidence has declined over the past year. BLS just restated job creation for 2018 as being much weaker than stated. The Fed is concerned and therefore cut rates. The executive branch is considering tax stimulus efforts that are utilized in recessions (payroll tax cuts, for example). Economic uncertainty caused by market turmoil (tariffs, etc.) is roiling the stock markets, which further causes consumer fear.
Would you like more indicators?
- The yield curve is a poor indicator of a recession as a standalone indicator. Also, in previous recessions, the yield curve inverted greatly. The yield curve inverted briefly in this case. The curve would need to be inverted for much longer and deeply to predict any recession.
- Consumer confidence has rebounded and is at/near all time high
- The Fed is concerned about global economic turmoil and not the interests of the United States. The Fed themselves say a recession is not likely.
- The executive branch is preparing for worst case scenario to mitigate any loss of voter confidence.
- The stock market is simply reacting to all of this and growth has still been phenomenal.
But please, keep them coming.
Not sure either of those trips will be any cheaper.This is pure insanity - just made my decision to take the kids to Italy or Australia much easier ! And I won't even have to be a "pig in a poke" winner !