wilde_oscar
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2007
I'm not trying to step on Pete's toes about mentioning other podcasts and websites, so I will try to start this discussion with out mentioning them directly...
I don't want to call it a conspiracy theory, but more and more I see the new trend and direction of WDW to more aggressively seek the upscale customer with a larger percentage of disposable income. I made the assumption when the Four Seasons announcement was posted that Disney was going to have to improve its game significantly. Four Seasons would not be going in unless they could offer their customer base an exclusive experience. If you are dropping $1000 a night for a room, expectations are going to run high. We are starting to see those initiatives, some in testing, some in practice.
Fast Pass system: yes there is going to be tiered levels of fast passes based on what you are paying a night for your onsite room. Exclusive room will equal exclusive access to bypass the lines... the Nintendo DS testing is part of this. A handheld computer that allows you fastpass access, maps, show times... this is not being done for the average customer. Development costs for this are way to high to recoup costs of infrastructure on a $10 a day rental... but if that guest is dropping $1000 a night for a room, a couple hundred a day for exclusive park tickets with unlimited fastpass, a couple hundred for their morning round of golf, a couple hundred per person on diner with wine... you are looking at a Four Seasons customer easily dropping $2000 a day for vacation.
Put that together with things that Pete and the gang have been saying about staying concierge level at the current Disney Resorts... it's not worth it. They are not providing the level of service that a Four Seasons customer would expect from a standard room let alone concierge services. And getting that level of customer to the parks, that will drop the kind of money that will impact the bottom line, they are not going to wait in line for their kids to get autographs.
Disney is going to have to strike a delicate balance here... the average vacation going family still needs to be taken care of, while at the same time not turning every attraction in to the haves and the have nots lines. I think the marketing department might have noticed that when they advertised a family of 4 going to WDW for $1600 that it became the number the family budgeted, and then made due with peanut butter and jelly along with skipping the shopping for the typical souvenirs. And that lead to the rooms being full, but the shops and restaurants not so much.
So much like in the cell phone business, or Cable vs. Dish... the only way to get new customers is to poach someone else's. So Disney is launching initiatives and ad campaigns (like in GQ) to poach the folks that take high end vacations to exotic locations.
So my question for discussion is... are we seeing a shift in how Disney will do business? Less emphasis on attracting the typical family in favor of attracting the upscale vacation traveler that would other wise be going to Hawaii, or Fiji, or the South of France?
I don't want to call it a conspiracy theory, but more and more I see the new trend and direction of WDW to more aggressively seek the upscale customer with a larger percentage of disposable income. I made the assumption when the Four Seasons announcement was posted that Disney was going to have to improve its game significantly. Four Seasons would not be going in unless they could offer their customer base an exclusive experience. If you are dropping $1000 a night for a room, expectations are going to run high. We are starting to see those initiatives, some in testing, some in practice.
Fast Pass system: yes there is going to be tiered levels of fast passes based on what you are paying a night for your onsite room. Exclusive room will equal exclusive access to bypass the lines... the Nintendo DS testing is part of this. A handheld computer that allows you fastpass access, maps, show times... this is not being done for the average customer. Development costs for this are way to high to recoup costs of infrastructure on a $10 a day rental... but if that guest is dropping $1000 a night for a room, a couple hundred a day for exclusive park tickets with unlimited fastpass, a couple hundred for their morning round of golf, a couple hundred per person on diner with wine... you are looking at a Four Seasons customer easily dropping $2000 a day for vacation.
Put that together with things that Pete and the gang have been saying about staying concierge level at the current Disney Resorts... it's not worth it. They are not providing the level of service that a Four Seasons customer would expect from a standard room let alone concierge services. And getting that level of customer to the parks, that will drop the kind of money that will impact the bottom line, they are not going to wait in line for their kids to get autographs.
Disney is going to have to strike a delicate balance here... the average vacation going family still needs to be taken care of, while at the same time not turning every attraction in to the haves and the have nots lines. I think the marketing department might have noticed that when they advertised a family of 4 going to WDW for $1600 that it became the number the family budgeted, and then made due with peanut butter and jelly along with skipping the shopping for the typical souvenirs. And that lead to the rooms being full, but the shops and restaurants not so much.
So much like in the cell phone business, or Cable vs. Dish... the only way to get new customers is to poach someone else's. So Disney is launching initiatives and ad campaigns (like in GQ) to poach the folks that take high end vacations to exotic locations.
So my question for discussion is... are we seeing a shift in how Disney will do business? Less emphasis on attracting the typical family in favor of attracting the upscale vacation traveler that would other wise be going to Hawaii, or Fiji, or the South of France?