cabanafrau
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- May 10, 2006
The academia setting explains some stuff.
Clearly there should be great fear and suspicion of academics and learning.
The academia setting explains some stuff.
So yes. People that want apologies or explanations for an opinion is spineless.
That's not how the Constitution works, though. It clearly establishes parts of the government and which part has which power. So, the First Amendment:Well at least in the USA ,WE are the government. Citizens are.
Don’t think that’s what he/she is talking about.Clearly there should be great fear and suspicion of academics and learning.
Don’t think that’s what he/she is talking about.
The things my step daughter were told, taught indoctrinated about in law school in Canada are frightening. Especially about US politics.
Lots of that too, sadly. Safe spaces.Clearly great reason for fear and suspicion of academics and learning.
Couldn't be any way that type of idea could be stretched and manipulated to indict the educational system, leave a vacuum in its wake, one that's conveniently ready to be filled by a bunch of "truth tellers". After all, we know universities are absolutely brimming with snowflakes huddled and quivering in their safe spaces, don't we?
Lots of that too, sadly. Safe spaces.
Don’t get my news on the internet so I wouldn’t know. My info is from the schools themselves.That's what it says all over the internet, so it must be true.
Can you share it or is it top secret?Don’t get my news on the internet so I wouldn’t know. My info is from the schools themselves.
Can you share it or is it top secret?
You get news regarding free speech from post secondary institutions but they don’t put in online?
What form of media do they use? Newspapers, radio, tv, paper report, drums?
How very mysterious !
If a post secondary didn’t post information online not sure how trustworthy they are.
And I have great difficulty believing that a Canadian law school spent hours discussing US politics rather than teaching Canadian law.
I think the problem is that some posters keep stating their beliefs about what US universities are doing with no backup; one stated they are emphatically not interested in providing any printed clarification. I don't get it but well there you are.So a first hand account from a student or faculty member doesn’t mean anything unless someone has a link to it?
Not saying it is or isn’t happening but I am saying that some times a person knows things from other ways than having a link to it.
I must say how it’s very amusing that on one hand, sarcastic remarks are made about something “must be true because it’s on the Internet” and on the other, links are demanded to “prove” something.
Can you share it or is it top secret?
You get news regarding free speech from post secondary institutions but they don’t put in online?
What form of media do they use? Newspapers, radio, tv, paper report, drums?
How very mysterious !
If a post secondary didn’t post information online not sure how trustworthy they are.
And I have great difficulty believing that a Canadian law school spent hours discussing US politics rather than teaching Canadian law.
I think the problem is that some posters keep stating their beliefs about what US universities are doing with no backup; one stated they are emphatically not interested in providing any printed clarification. I don't get it but well there you are.
So a first hand account from a student or faculty member doesn’t mean anything unless someone has a link to it?
Not saying it is or isn’t happening but I am saying that some times a person knows things from other ways than having a link to it.
I must say how it’s very amusing that on one hand, sarcastic remarks are made about something “must be true because it’s on the Internet” and on the other, links are demanded to “prove” something.
https://www.thepostmillennial.com/eight-canadian-universities-are-completely-failing-at-free-speech/Can you share it or is it top secret?
You get news regarding free speech from post secondary institutions but they don’t put in online?
What form of media do they use? Newspapers, radio, tv, paper report, drums?
How very mysterious !
If a post secondary didn’t post information online not sure how trustworthy they are.
And I have great difficulty believing that a Canadian law school spent hours discussing US politics rather than teaching Canadian law.
So a first hand account from a student or faculty member doesn’t mean anything unless someone has a link to it?
First hand account from a student is an anecdote, it’s not factual.
If there is a POLICY in a public institution it would be online.
The plural of anecdote is not data.
Data? Who said anything about needing data?
It has to do with claiming something is widespread based on a few anecdotes. It's like saying vaccines are dangerous because 1 person's child got sick, even though 39 million other children didn't. Complaining about liberal indoctrination and "safe spaces" and whatever at universities like it's some type of conspiracy instead of isolated incidents or specific to liberal arts degrees. Or without the larger context of the situation. Like, how much of a problem is free speech in a Calculus 4 class? What kind of indoctrination goes on at BYU or Liberty University?