Sorry it would probably always be bad to make a second movie in a Trilogy, give the reins to a different director from the first movie and allow that director a free hand to make any changes to the story arc even if it totally screws up the plot of movies before it. Also..... I think that was a run on sentence......
Agreed. Rian has again admitted he used it as a "platform" for what he wanted out there discussed, good and bad I suppose-his right to do.
But a few minor changes to the FA story ie "part 2".
1) Kylo's mask. Was kinda cool to have a "voice" and "visual" villain following in ("I will finish what you started") Vader's footsteps. Then Snoke belittles JJ-I mean Kylo and neutered into a simple man we now have as the bad guy-count me as not scared for IX's villain.
Are we expected to shout "Take that stupid mask off" when we watch the Star Wars Stage show at DHS?
2) Vader and Luke's Light Saber. So much history here a movie could have been made out of it ("that's a story for another time"), Rey simply touching it showed her the past and scared her death. Yet Luke just tosses it away.
3) Spending the whole movie looking for Luke, all for naught plus he's dead (covered over and over).
4) Snoke killed with no back story/explanation. Again-who is the villain for IX?
5) Rey spends an entire scene underground to see who she is, again nobody (jury is out I admit).
6) Phasma-again no story or seeing who she is then killed (jury is still out I admit).
7) Knights of Ren flashback, is that gone for good? What a scene to see/expand on, and now Luke is gone to confront them.
8) Rey's flashback being left on the planet, why even have that then.
9) Animal abuse, child slave labor, capitalism is bad (sells arms to both sides), the women movement. Noble, but in Star Wars?
10) "Let the past die", but see Solo in a theater near you.