We should at least be skeptical of projections that predict major deaths in the next few months (some exceeding what was saw in the spring). I'm not saying it won't happen, but I do think there is an incentive for models to make projections outside of reasonable expectations, since they get the most attention from the media. Neil Ferguson, in the UK, predicted 2.2 million deaths in the U.S. He is now making the rounds predicting massive new deaths. He has a terrible track record - predicting 150 million would die from bird flu, when it turned out to be several hundred. He repeats this pattern over and over anytime a new disease on the horizon. Therefore, I believe skepticism is warranted.
If Europe holds in its current patter, in the U.S., I expect to see spots of significant new cases, but fairly lower death-rates compared to what we saw in the spring. I hope increasing cases don't result in cruise lines pulling back from finding ways to operate.
I agree with you that skepticism is warranted.
The real point of my post was not to agree with the projections, but rather to gently correct the wrong narrative that deaths had been steadily increasing since April (cumulative deaths always increase since people don't un-die) and that the model predicted a peak in January (which is not even included in the interval covered by IHME at the time of the comment).
If people become better grounded in what has actually occurred, maybe it will help them put things into a better context.